|
|
Since GRRN’s inception, producer responsibility has been a key ingredient of our program and agenda for achieving Zero Waste. Shifting the costs of waste from taxpayers to brand owners and producers creates a powerful economic incentive to design waste out of the system and substantially reduce the use of toxic materials. Moreover, strategies like producer responsibility that don’t rely on taxpayer dollars are increasingly attractive to policy makers facing budget deficits and revenue shortfalls. Today’s fiscal climate presents a moment of tremendous opportunity to make producer responsibility for waste a reality. Extended Producer Responsibility, or EPR, and including ‘producer take-back’ systems, describes policies and practices requiring product brand-owners to take full physical or financial responsibility for the life-cycle impacts of their products, from product design to end-of-life product management. Extended Producer
Responsibility has been a major movement since the early 1990s in other
countries, but it has been slower to take off in the United States. This
is beginning to change through collaborative endeavors like GRRN's Beverage
Take-Back Campaign (see below), the Computer TakeBack Campaign (see below),
the Clean Car
Campaign [off-site],
the Mercury Policy
Project [off-site],
and the work of Clean
Production Action PVC: Recycling Killer, Public Health Menace Campaigns Computer
TakeBack [off-site] Beverage
Take-Back Archived Mercury Switch-Out Confront
Dow! (Herbicide Threatens Composting)
|
|||||||||||||